A Deep Dive into Britain’s Islamic Grooming Gangs

And the Horrifying Implications They Bring 

Lionheart 

 

 

Few things have shocked me as much as reading the testimonies from Rupert Lowe’s rape gang inquiry. I expected horror, yet somehow I was still taken aback by the sheer depravity and grotesque details seen. The rape gangs feature horrors that you’d expect out of the Second World War or a Stephen King horror novel. Not out of 21st Century Britain.

And yet, despite all the shock and horror, many remain unaware of the true details of the rape gangs or what the implications of the rape gangs are. Factors like anti-white racism or Islam largely remain shielded from scrutiny.

Furthermore, if these anti-white rape gangs can happen while white Britons are a comfortable majority, what happens if we are no longer a majority?

Before we can dive into these implications, we have to comprehend the scale of the rape gangs and the level of depravity they displayed:

In 2017, Quilliam published a report, stating that 84 per cent of convicted rape gang members were “Asian”.

A leftist, Dr. Ella Cockbain claimed to have “debunked” this figure in 2021: writing gleefully in The Guardian that “research has found that group-based offenders are most commonly White. A powerful modern racial myth has been exploded.”

However, in Cockbain’s own work, her sample showed “a clear majority [80 percent] of offenders — both on individual cases and overall — were of Pakistani heritage.” Even the Home Office paper that Cockbain uses to refute Quilliam’s claim cites a 2013 report, which found in “offenders across all groups, of the 306 offenders 75% were Asian.”

The conclusion that white men are the majority of CSE perpetrators actually means that “Asian” men are three times more likely to commit child sex offences, per capita. This is corroborated by a report from the Telegraph which revealed that Pakistanis are up to four times more likely to commit group-based child sexual abuse offences than the general public in Wales and England.

The most recent data from all 43 forces in England and Wales showthat 13.7 percent of child sexual exploitation “grooming” offences in the first nine months of last year involved Pakistanis. This means they are four times more likely than white Brits to be convicted of child sex offences. In specific towns, it is 1 in every 280 Muslim males in Rochdale, one in every 126 in Telford, and in Rotherham, 1 in 16.

I’ve attached some mugshots of convicted rape gangs in Rotherham to display the ethnic and religious composition of these gangs:

However according to reporter Charlie Peters and other Police chiefs, these new figures are likely to be higher, as they only covered 30 percent of suspects. Furthermore, the population estimates are based on the 2021 Census — taken before the Boriswave of annual record net migration, particularly from Pakistan.

In addition, in many of these cases, the ethnicity of the perpetrator has not been recorded. The number of crimes where a convict’s ethnicity was not recorded has increased exponentially, especially for child sex offences, see below:

 

 

 

Given that the sex of the convict is still recorded, it appears police officers are purposefully not reporting the ethnicity of offenders. The motivation would likely be out of a politically correct desire to hide the overrepresentation of brown Pakistani Muslims among the perpetrators.

The 2022 Telford inquiry corroborates this: “There was a nervousness about race […] bordering on a reluctance [by police] to investigate crimes committed by what was described as the ‘Asian’ community”.

One thirteen-year-old girl was raped 600-700 times across three years. A survivor had a gun held to her head, was beaten so badly she was covered “head to toe in bruises,” and had a knife held to her throat so she would “sort out 10,15 cars full of men.” White girls were drugged and put in dog cages. A 16-year-old girl was raped by 100 different men. The gangs raped the girls with Coca-Cola bottles, keys and even a baseball bat. One survivor saw her friend have a knife held to her throat while she was being raped.

Another was beaten “black and blue” and was raped by physical objects alongside the men themselves. Murder was rarer but still occurred. A fifteen-year-old girl remembered walking into a rapist’s flat and seeing a dead girl in the bath. There was one specific park where hundreds of girls were groomed and raped.

Like drug rings, the rape gangs operated as a network in cities like Derby, Birmingham, Sheffield and others. British women had their children kidnapped and were likely taken as sex slaves somewhere in the Middle East.

You might be asking how the government allowed these rape gangs to go on for years, even decades. The answer is that modern liberalism created the conditions where such atrocities could occur.

A survivor described the rape gangs as “untouchable” because nobody “wants to be deemed a racist” by openly acknowledging the problem exists and doing something about it. This is reinforced in the Jay and Louise Casey reports, which explain why whistleblowers didn’t come forward sooner with knowledge of the abuse, because “you couldn’t bring up race issues in meetings … or you would be branded a racist.”

This toxic culture stemmed from modern liberalism, which preaches “diversity” and “multiculturalism”, which in practice means“white English bad, minorities good.” Mass migration became justified under the pretext of “cultural enrichment.” Why we needed cultural enrichment from the third world is a question no one can answer to this day. Yet fears of being called racist prevented many from speaking about the rape gangs.

Others of liberal mind didn’t want to damage the multicultural utopia they thought Britain was. Former Rotherham MP Denis MacShane admitted he avoided investigating child sexual abuse in Rotherham because “as a true Guardian reader, and liberal leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard… I think there was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat, if I may put it like that.” In other words, preserving “multiculturalism” became more important than preventing child rape.

The multiculturalism delusion stems from a misguided belief that immigration solely enriches the host nation and that the host population should just shut up and be grateful rather than complain about immigration. This belief has captured our establishment and has created an environment where the native English majority are looked upon with suspicion, while minorities are given preferential treatment.

Under the umbrella of multiculturalism, Islamic rape gangs were able to thrive, driven by Islamic scripture and anti-white hatred.

There is no shortage of scripture in Islamic scripture that depraved rapists could use to justify their predation on non-Muslim children. One survivor recalled her abuser speaking Quran verses aloud while he beat her. Violence against non-Muslims is justified in the Quranand the Hadiths. Prophet Mohammed himself took sex-slaves as the spoils of conquest.

Prominent Muslims have reiterated this backward view of women. Influencer Mohammed Hijab has said “Paedophilia is very relative,” and argued that marital sexual relations with a thirteen-year-old girl is acceptable if she has “huge hips… huge breasts”. Hijab’s view is undoubtedly shaped by the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha, aged six, and the consummation of the marriage when she reached nine. This is also why some of the victims were married to their rapists in traditional Islamic ceremonies.

Dr Taj Hargey, imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation and head of the Oxford Institute for British Islam, believes ignoring the connection between Islam and the rape gangs is “ideological denial.” Hargey wrote:“Terrified of accusations of racism, desperate not to undermine the official creed of cultural diversity, they took no action against obvious abuse.”

Hargey also details the racial motivation for the rape gangs. Hargey reveals that many Imans view white women in an “appalling” way. These imams “encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent, and sleazy” all of which are made worse by “the fact that they are kaffirs or non-believers.” Hargey believes that “according to this mentality, these white women deserve to be punished for their behaviour by being exploited and degraded.”

We see this anti-white hatred openly expressed by the rape gang perpetrators.

In 2013, Shabir Ahmed was convicted as the ringleader of a Rochdale rape gang. At his trial, Ahmed denied all charges and later said, “We are a civilised society. We are the supreme race, not these white b******s” (pointing to police officers in court).

Another rapist, Badrul Hussain, when caught travelling without a ticket on public transport, told the female ticket inspector, “All white women are only good for one thing. For men like me to … use like trash. That’s all women like you are worth”. Survivor Ella Hill has detailed how frequently she was denigrated a “white slag”, “white whore”, or “white c*nt.”

Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, has said that “The sad reality is that in the case of on-street gang grooming, there is an over-representation of Pakistani men”, but explained how “any of us who try to tackle this problem [are seen] as siding with the white ‘enemy’”.

Perhaps the only thing worse than the horrors of the Islamic rape gangs is the implications they bring.

The state-led cover-up of the rape gangs to preserve their diversity delusion begs the question of what other atrocities have also been covered up for the same reason?

If thousands of white girls are raped, tortured, and in some cases killed by Islamic rape gangs while the white British are well over 70%+ of the population and the Islamic population is only around 7%, what happens when the white British decrease and the Islamic population increases? By 2063, white Britons will be a minority in Britain, and the Muslim population is increasing rapidly. Once our demographic security is gone, we will be left defenceless against horrors like the Islamic rape gangs. What horrors will our grandchildren endure if demographic trends are not reversed?

Worrying examples already exist of persecuted minorities in majority-Muslim countries. The Druz in Syria have faced recent massacres by Jihadists and more may follow. In 2025 alone, more than 7,000 Christians were killed in Nigeria. Perhaps worst of all are the Yazidis who experienced a genocide at the hands of ISIS. Thousands of Yazidis were slaughtered and kidnapped, women and girls were taken as sex slaves, while many boys were forced to convert to Islam.

To give one example, 19 Yazidi girls were burned alive in cages for refusing to partake in sex acts. Will that be the fate of our descendants? I refuse to accept that to be the case.

All foreign and dual nationals involved in the rape gangs or covering them up should be deported. None yet have. If that means thousands, tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands deported, then so be it.

Yet the mindset that allowed the rape gangs to operate still captures so much of our political class today. In response to MP Rupert Lowe’s request that foreign aid and visas be leveraged to force Pakistan to repatriate their rapists, the foreign office said:

“We recognise and appreciate the great contribution of Pakistani people to the diverse culture of the UK.”

Despite all the horrors that have been made public, the political class still cling to their ideological belief that “Diversity is our Strength.” It certainly is not the strength of the girls whose lives have been ruined and in some cases, ended by these Islamic rape gangs.

Thanks for reading.